MFA Archives - Safe Systems

29 Aug 2024

Banks, Credit Unions, Technology Eric Delgado 0 comment

Understanding and Avoiding Misconfigurations in Conditional Access Policies

Conditional Access Policies (CAPs) are essential for safeguarding your financial institution’s data and ensuring that only authorized users gain access to critical systems. Yet, misconfigurations in these policies can create significant vulnerabilities. In a recent webinar, Top 3 Most Common Misconfigurations for CAPs, Safe Systems’ M365-certified administrators delved into common mistakes and demonstrated firsthand how to fix them.

This webinar was the first in the highly anticipated M365 Immersion Training, a 4-part online series focusing on the most crucial aspects of Microsoft 365 (M365) security. This blog explores some of the highlights from the first session, including key terminology, policy scenarios, and best practices for policy management.

Understanding the Language of Conditional Access

CAPs act as an identity firewall, setting stringent conditions for user authentication across various applications and devices. Before diving into the complexities of CAPs, it’s crucial to grasp the key terminology.

Entra ID: The identity platform within Azure where CAPs reside.
Named Locations: These are specific network locations, such as IP ranges or countries, recognized by CAPs.
Logic Gaps: Holes in your policy set that can lead to unauthorized access.
Compensating Controls: Additional policies created to target logic gaps found in your CAPs.

Understanding these terms is the first step toward ensuring that your CAPs are both effective and secure.

3 Most Common Misconfigurations

Misconfiguring CAPs is like locking every door in your house but forgetting to lock the windows; it might look secure on the surface but is fundamentally flawed. CAPs must be meticulously configured to avoid creating security vulnerabilities.

Here are the three most common errors to be aware of:

Exclusion of Break Glass Accounts: These are emergency access accounts that should almost always be excluded from CAPs to ensure that administrators can regain control in case of a lockout or technology failure.
Improper Definition of Named Locations: Incorrectly defining a named location can lead to overly broad or restrictive access controls.
Overlooking Multi-factor Authentication (MFA) Requirements: Failing to extend MFA requirements to cover all potential access scenarios can expose the system to unauthorized access.

Implementing fixes is not just about addressing the immediate issue but also about future-proofing your CAPs. To see a hands-on demonstration of how these common misconfigurations can occur and how our team resolves them, watch this 5 minute excerpt from the webinar.

Key Takeaways and Best Practices

Effective management of CAPs is not just about implementation but also about ongoing management and continuous improvement. Institutions should adopt the following best practices to ensure their CAPs provide the intended security without unintended consequences:

Proper Naming and Documentation: Ensure accurate and meaningful naming for CAPs and related entities to avoid confusion.
Use of Report-Only Mode: Initially deploy policies in report-only mode to monitor their impact without affecting business continuity.
Regular Review and Testing: Policies should be reviewed and tested at least quarterly to ensure they align with current security needs and operational requirements.
External Validation: Utilize external audits from trusted vendors for an unbiased assessment.
Comprehensive Training: Ensure that IT staff are well-trained in understanding and managing CAPs, including awareness of common pitfalls and best practices.

Conclusion

Conditional Access Policies are your frontline defense against unauthorized access. Regular reviews, external audits, and comprehensive documentation are your keys to mastering CAPs, ensuring that your security measures are always a step ahead of potential threats.

If you’ve missed this session, it’s not too late to register for the rest of the M365 Immersion Training. When you register for the series, you will gain access to the full recording of this webinar, plus all upcoming live sessions.

26 Jan 2024

Banks, Credit Unions, Technology Eric Delgado 0 comment

Enhancing Security for Microsoft 365 Services

Many financial institutions depend on productivity products like Microsoft Teams, Exchange Online, OneDrive, and SharePoint to enhance their business operations. More specifically, a significant percentage of community banks and credit unions use Microsoft 365 (M365) and Exchange Online to provide email service for their employees, based on the findings of Safe Systems’ 2023 Cybersecurity Outlook for Community Banks and Credit Unions survey.

This recent research indicates that more than 119 out of 144 respondents—83%—use M365 and Exchange Online for their email service. Despite the widespread adoption, some community banking institutions are not aware that when they leverage these cloud-based services, extra security measures must be implemented Therefore, some may not be utilizing all the available security settings or services to their fullest potential.

Multifactor Authentication

To protect their M365 infrastructure, institutions are customizing Microsoft’s out-of-the-box security services. For instance, 50% of 114 survey respondents use dual or multifactor authentication (MFA). An additional 40% of the same respondents supplement dual or MFA with security configurations such as conditional access policies (CAPs).

MFA is a crucial security measure because it can block 99% of account compromise attacks, according to Microsoft. But cybercriminals are launching more sophisticated attacks to exploit human error and bypass MFA requirements. Case in point: There are over 300 million fraudulent sign-in attempts to Microsoft’s cloud services every day—and cyberattacks are escalating. Financial institutions must remain vigilant and constantly modify their efforts to ensure the most effective use of MFA.

Conditional Access Policies

Banking institutions that use M365 services should also be aware that the implementation of additional security controls is their responsibility, not Microsoft or a licensed reseller. The use of Conditional Access Policies (CAPs) is a key strategy for securing Entra ID (formerly known as Azure AD) because they are the highest control layer for access (sign-ins) within Azure. Using multiple CAPs—those that target a mixture of MFA, applications, clients, locations, compliance status, and device types—is an ideal way to add protective layers within Azure.

Beyond covering M365 services, the survey offers valuable, peer-to-peer insights on these other important prevention and detection security layers, such as employee security awareness training and testing, vulnerability and patch management, email infrastructure, and cybersecurity preparedness.

Download our latest white paper to learn more about how your financial institution can enhance security when using Azure or any M365 services.

18 Jan 2024

Banks, Compliance, Credit Unions, Security, Technology Safe Systems 0 comment

Top Blogs of 2023

Our Top Blog Posts of 2023

As we begin the new year, it’s a great time to revisit some of the most popular blogs we published in 2023. Our top blogs from last year covered a range of topics, including a cybersecurity outlook, updated third-party risk management guidelines, using conditional access policies (CAPs) and multifactor authentication (MFA) to enhance security within Microsoft Azure Active Directory (AD), and NetConnect 2023. If you didn’t have a chance to read these posts—or simply want to review them—here is a recap of each of them. They offer unique perspectives, best practices, and a wealth of insights that can help your financial institution prepare for greater success in the year ahead.

2023 Cybersecurity Outlook for Community Banks and Credit Unions

Safe Systems’ 2023 Cybersecurity Outlook for Community Banks and Credit Unions revealed valuable peer-to-peer insights that can help financial institutions enhance their security posture. The survey highlights cyber preparedness and budget restraints as top security challenges of more than 50% of the 160 participating financial institutions. It also shared participants’ feedback on other important areas, including prevention and detection security layers; employee security awareness training and testing; and advanced firewall features. For instance, respondents use multiple layers of security, but less than 50% of them combine every security layer listed in the survey. Survey respondents also use a variety of security training—including resource-intensive individual instruction. In addition, most of the survey participants are taking advantage of advanced firewall features, although only 24% of 135 respondents leverage sandboxing technology to detect threats. Read more.

Updated Regulatory Guidelines on Third-Party Risk Management

In June, federal bank regulatory agencies issued updated guidelines to make it easier for financial institutions to manage third-party risks. This new guidance from the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC), and Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) impacts all banking institutions that use third parties. The majority of statements in the new guidance focus on the planning, due diligence, and contract phases with an emphasis on pre-engagement. Since auditors and examiners will be looking more closely at what happens during the pre-engagement stage, institutions need to place more emphasis on scrutinizing potential third parties. Not all statements in the guidance will apply to all institutions or relationships, so we have developed an interactive checklist designed to walk you through key regulatory requirements of the third-party relationship life cycle. Read more.

Using CAPs and MFA to Enhance Security within Microsoft Azure AD

There was a surge in successful phishing campaigns last year, including sophisticated schemes that were able to bypass MFA. MFA-resistant phishing is a significant threat since this type of attack could impact a vast segment of organizations that rely on Microsoft Azure AD (now known as Microsoft Entra ID) and Microsoft M365 services to support their operations. However, financial institutions can use a variety of measures to prevent cyberattacks, including Conditional Access Policies (CAPs). CAPs, which are foundational to safeguarding identities within Microsoft Entra ID, protect the initial step of the identification chain—the sign-in attempt. To maximize protection, institutions should stack multiple CAPs, such as requiring MFA, denying sign-ins from outside of the USA, and requiring device compliance. When designing CAP logic, they should take a broad approach to the scope of the CAP to impact as many areas as possible. Institutions can take a multi-layered approach to optimizing security by leveraging multiple security tactics, technologies, and resources. Read more.

NetConnect 2023—A Glimpse into the Future of Technology and Compliance

The 2023 NetConnect Customer User Conference brought Safe Systems’ customers, employees, and partners together in Alpharetta, Ga. to discuss banking industry trends, challenges, and innovations. NetConnect 2023 provided valuable insights into banking and technology’s vital role in shaping the industry’s future. With multiple informative sessions, the conference covered the significance of hope in business, changes relating to regulatory compliance, vulnerability management, and Microsoft Azure fundamentals. Read more.

Get the latest industry developments, insights, and trends delivered directly to your inbox. Subscribe now to the Safe Systems blog.

30 Nov 2023

Banks, Compliance, Credit Unions, Security, Technology Jamie Davis 0 comment

Important Industry Insights on the Use of Anti-Malware and Advanced Features for Ransomware Protection

According to the IC3 2022 Internet Crime Report, the FBI received 2,385 complaints identified as ransomware with adjusted losses of more than $34.3 million. Moreover, 870 of these complaints indicated that organizations belonging to a critical infrastructure sector, such as financial services, were victims of a ransomware attack. This makes it imperative for banks and credit unions to employ a variety of measures to protect themselves against the growing threat of ransomware attacks. Yet many financial institutions that are leveraging anti-malware solutions are not using advanced features that can help protect against ransomware threats. According to Safe Systems’ 2023 Cybersecurity Outlook for Community Banks and Credit Unions, advanced features for anti-malware/anti-ransomware solutions such as root cause analysis, advanced machine learning algorithms, and sandbox analysis only received 12% or less of the answers among the survey participants.

With advanced features, financial institutions can more effectively monitor security threats on endpoints and ascertain the source and extent of an attack. Institutions that want to enhance their ability to detect and respond to threats might consider expanding their cybersecurity budget to increase spending on advanced anti-malware and endpoint protection features.

Recovery Strategies

As part of their recovery strategies, more than one-third of 144 survey respondents say they have implemented notification measures, including notifications to customers, regulators, and applicable insurance carriers. This is critical given the recently finalized interagency Computer-Security Incident Notification Rule. It requires banking organizations to notify their primary federal regulator about any significant “computer-security incident” as soon as possible after a cyber incident happens. (A computer-security incident, as defined by the rule, is an occurrence that results in actual harm to the confidentiality, integrity, or availability of an information system or the information that the system processes, stores, or transmits.) Nearly 30% also leverage other important recovery strategies such as monitoring for the early detection of potential incidents and eliminating intruder access points.

Other Key Security Issues

In addition to shedding light on how institutions use advanced features for anti-malware/anti-ransomware solutions, our comprehensive survey highlights several other security issues, including Microsoft 365 services, email infrastructure, advanced firewall features, vulnerability and patch management, and more. Banks and credit unions must effectively address all of these areas to stay ahead of the constantly evolving cybersecurity landscape.

Download a copy of our latest white paper to read the complete survey findings, which can provide a deeper understanding of current cybersecurity concerns and best practices to enhance your institution’s security posture.

16 Nov 2023

Banks, Compliance, Credit Unions, Security, Technology Jamie Davis 0 comment

What You Need to Know from the 2023 Cybersecurity Outlook for Community Banks and Credit Unions

As cyber threats become more complex, aggressive, and prevalent, implementing cybersecurity mitigation strategies is becoming more critical in the financial services sector. Not surprisingly, cyber preparedness and budget restraints are the top security challenges for more than half of the financial institutions that responded to the Safe Systems survey, 2023 Cybersecurity Outlook for Community Banks and Credit Unions.

Our analysis presents input from approximately 160 participants who responded to 55 questions (including multiple-choice) based on how relevant each query was to their organization.* In addition to focusing on the top security challenges, the survey highlights respondents’ input on several other critical areas, including:

Prevention and Detection Security Layers: Modern operating environments require a more robust security strategy that goes beyond implementing a basic firewall or anti-malware solution to protect their information and infrastructure from the growing number of cyber threats. Survey respondents are implementing multiple security layers, including firewall, patch management, anti-malware, email encryption, employee training and testing, vulnerability monitoring, and security log monitoring. However, less than 50% of all respondents use every security layer listed in the survey, which indicates they can do more to protect themselves against cyberattacks.
Employee Security Awareness Training and Testing: 95% of all cybersecurity issues can be linked to mistakes made by individuals, with 43% of breaches attributed to insider threats, according to the 2022 Global Risk Report by the World Economic Forum, making employee security awareness training and testing critical for financial institutions. Accordingly, survey respondents are deploying multiple types of security training, including simulated phishing attacks, self-service online training and exercises, interactive classroom training, and more. Of the 144 participants responding to this question, 60% indicate they conduct individual training based on need, which is notable because this method of instruction normally requires more time and resources.
Advanced Firewall Features: A majority of the participants responding to this question indicate that they are using one or more advanced firewall (or next-gen firewall) features, such as intrusion prevention or detection systems (IPS/IDS), transport layer security (TLS)/secure socket layers (SSL), and Geo-IT filtering. Whether managed in-house or through an outside provider, these expanded capabilities can help institutions protect their network and institution against a broad array of threats. Sandboxing, for example, provides a safe, isolated environment to execute and observe potentially malicious code from unverified programs, files, suppliers, users, or websites. Out of 135 respondents, only 24% indicate they have sandboxing despite its ability to identify threats.
Cybersecurity Preparedness: Examiners recognize the increasing volume and sophistication of cyber threats and have an increased focus on cybersecurity preparedness in assessing the effectiveness of an institution’s overall information security program. Out of 128 respondents, 52% confirm that the focus on information security, including cybersecurity, has increased during their IT audits and exams. IT examiners and auditors are also reviewing whether institutions have completed any of the common cybersecurity assessments (e.g., CAT, ACET, or CRI/NIST), and they are using them to evaluate institutions’ security posture during an exam. According to the same respondents, 43% say they had their cybersecurity assessment reviewed and used as part of their latest IT exam, and 39% indicate that they received recommendations based on it.

To access the complete survey and gain valuable peer-to-peer insights that can help your institution enhance its cybersecurity decision-making process, read “2023 Cybersecurity Outlook for Community Banks and Credit Unions“.

* The number of respondents varies per question. For multiple-choice questions, the Percent (Respondents) is calculated by dividing each answer count by the total unique respondents, and the Percent (Answers) is calculated by dividing each answer count by the total counts collected.

26 Oct 2023

Banks, Credit Unions, Security, Technology Jamie Davis 0 comment

The New Rules and Best Practices of Password Security

Passwords have always been a reliable option for digital security. In the early days, you simply provided something that only you knew to authenticate yourself, and voila, your identity would be confirmed. But the world of passwords has changed. Initially, they were easy―you had fewer of them; you often needed physical access to use them; and people were just nicer back then. At least, that’s the way I remember it.

But did people really change… or did the world just get smaller with the growth of the internet—giving bad actors greater access to our digital domains? One thing is clear, password security requires new rules and strategies to keep up with the fast-changing cyber landscape. In addition to following best practices for creating strong passwords, you also need to consider employing multifactor authentication (MFA) or adopting a password management solution.

Embracing MFA

Whenever possible, you should avoid relying solely on passwords. The better option is to implement MFA, which adds another layer of security. While there are MFA-resistant phishing attacks, enabling MFA significantly minimizes the risk of compromise. In recent years, MFA has evolved to become more robust and secure, and there are different levels of quality in MFA. For instance, Microsoft Modern MFA doesn’t merely require you to click “accept” on a device; you have to input a numerical code to confirm the login attempt. (Always use the most advanced and newest version that aligns with your user base’s tolerance.)

Using a Password Manager

There are situations where MFA is not available or does not make sense to use. In these cases, passwords may be your best or only option. This indicates the importance of using some type of password management solution. A password management tool can be an effective way to keep track of the plethora of passwords that most people have. The average person has more than 100 passwords, according to a study by Nord Pass. That’s too many passwords for anyone to remember.

As a low-tech solution, some people write their passwords down in a notebook. If the book is securely locked away, this method may be acceptable, but it’s not ideal. However, I recommend using a software-based password management system that allows the user to create one login to access all their passwords. Only use a digital password manager that offers MFA to access passwords. If you’re not sure which solution to choose, there are numerous resources to guide you like this article from CNET. However, the best option for you will depend on your specific needs and goals.

Best Practices for Creating Strong Passwords

Password best practices have changed over the years. But as a general rule, you should never—ever—recycle a password. An existing password may be easier to remember and more convenient to reuse. But it’s not worth the risk; if your password is stolen, every place you have used it could be compromised.

You should also avoid including personal details in passwords. For example, don’t create a password using your child’s initials and birth year—no matter how cleverly you format it. (I know, you’re thinking: “But I used lower and upper case and separated them with a comma.” Trust me, so did the database that is being run against your accounts.)

It’s also important to ensure that every site, application, etc. has a strong password. Here are a few techniques for crafting strong passwords:

Make them long. Aim for at least 14 characters—or even longer—since you can easily copy and paste them into your password management tool. Some sites and applications often have character restrictions for passwords. In these cases, focus more on creating a random password that will be more difficult for someone to guess.
In situations where you frequently use a password and copying it from a management program is not an option, consider using passphrases. Instead of choosing a simple password like “BillyJoe1998,” use “BillyJoeGraduatedIn1998.”
“i” and “l’s” became “1’s”
“a” became “@”
“e” became “3,” which looks similar to a backward capital “E”
Still, another option is to insert punctuation between words. If you added “!” to the previous password, it would read B111y!J03!Gr@du@+3d!1n!1998.

Using a combination of these approaches is the best way to make passwords more complex and secure. Ultimately, the key to protecting your passwords is to constantly adapt and remain vigilant in the ever-evolving world of digital security.

29 Sep 2023

Banks, Credit Unions, Security, Technology Eric Delgado 0 comment

Using Conditional Access Policies and MFA to Enhance Azure AD Security

Earlier this year, we saw a large influx of successful phishing campaigns, primarily due to attackers being able to circumvent multifactor authentication (MFA). Their schemes worked because they were able to trick users into clicking on a link and giving away their security token—essentially bypassing MFA. The human-error factor highlights the need for phishing simulation training to ensure users are more aware of security threats. With phishing attacks still running rampant—and becoming more complex and harder to detect—it’s imperative that financial institutions use multiple strategies and technologies to optimize security.

The implications of MFA-resistant phishing are huge; the attacks have the potential to affect numerous organizations that depend on Microsoft Entra ID (formerly Azure AD) and Microsoft Office/M365 services to support their operations. However, institutions can minimize account compromises by combining a variety of tactics to prevent cyberattacks from happening. For instance, conditional access policies (CAPs) are a key proactive measure that banks and credit unions can implement to enhance security.

CAPs—which are quickly becoming the baseline of security—are the cornerstone of protecting identities within Microsoft Entra ID. These policies protect the very first step of the identification chain, the sign in attempt. They govern the conditions for users to access Azure services and will grant or deny access based on configured logic. At a high level, this logic can be far reaching but even so, organizations will not rely on only a single CAP. No CAP can provide complete protection. Instead, financial institutions should stack multiple CAPs together to produce better overall coverage and security. For example, requiring MFA, denying sign ins form outside of the USA, and requiring device compliance or specific join status.

Not only will organizations look to stack multiple CAPs, but they will also look to utilize telemetry from multiple Azure services for their logic. Combining services means institutions must have the appropriate licensing for each respective Azure service. For example, to obtain device compliance information, organizations will be required to implement and license for Intune.

Additionally, when designing CAP logic, it can be helpful to take as broad of an approach as possible to the scope of the CAP. The objective is to try to affect as many areas as possible with a single stroke to maximize coverage and reduce gaps in logic. Gaps, or logic bugs, are the result of incorrect scope definitions which will leave an organization vulnerable or at risk when they believe otherwise. A good example of a logic bug is when an organization implements a CAP requiring MFA but not for all users. This leaves a subset of the user base at risk.

Generally, when it comes to creating gaps in logic for CAPs, the rule of thumb is to always create compensating controls. This is how organizations can create complex webs of conditions and still allow for business continuity while simultaneously reducing risk. The trade-off is the more complex an organization’s CAPs are, the harder they will be to design, assess at a glance, and to maintain.

By blending various security tactics and technologies, financial institutions can implement a layered approach to enhance their security posture. They can also partner with a third-party expert like Safe Systems to improve their ability to proactively detect and respond to phishing attacks and other threats. Our CloudInsight™ M365 Security Basics solution offers critical reporting and alerting to help institutions better gauge their security awareness. M365 Security Basics provides visibility into security settings for Azure AD and M365, making it easier for institutions to mitigate the impact of potential cyberattacks.

For more information about how to employ CAPS and modern MFA to minimize security risks, view our recorded webinar on “Securing Azure AD with Conditional Access Policies.“

06 Mar 2023

Banks, Credit Unions, Security, Technology Eric Delgado 0 comment

MFA—Why You Can’t Set It and Forget It

MFA - Why You Can’t Set It and Forget It

Multifactor authentication (MFA) is not a static, set-it-and-forget-it process. Financial institutions must constantly monitor—and make necessary adjustments—to ensure effectiveness so that only authorized users are accessing their network, data, and services.

MFA Methods and Risk

Some of the most common MFA methods, particularly with Microsoft Azure are:

FIDO2 security key
Microsoft Authenticator app
Windows Hello for Business
OATH hardware/software tokens
Short messaging service (SMS)
Voice calls

FIDO2—the latest and greatest MFA—enables easy and secure authentication. It takes passwords out of the equation and instead uses public key cryptography for authentication to enhance security. The Microsoft Authenticator app is also capable of passwordless authentication in Azure, which is making it an increasingly popular option. This modern multi-factor authentication method can act as a FIDO2 key, send push notifications, and support user awareness by providing location and client data within the app.

Windows Hello for Business is another form of advanced authentication that is also capable of passwordless authentication. However, institutions should be careful when implementing this approach to MFA because it can entail unique stipulations.

Two of the riskiest types of authentication are MFA facilitated by either SMS or voice calls. SMS-enabled MFA, which combines the use of a text message and code, is one of the most frequently used methods of authentication. However, since text messages are not encrypted, they are vulnerable to telecom tower relaying interference. Because of this vulnerability and its wide adoption, SMS is a major target of attackers. Voice calling, which uses telecom services to call with the code, is another risky form of MFA because it is possible that someone else could intercept the phone call.

For any TOTP-based method of MFA, there is an inherent risk of users giving away the codes. This can be accomplished via clever phishing techniques or malicious applications on mobile devices.

Combining MFA with Other Defensive Layers

Today’s sophisticated cyberattacks often attempt to exploit weaknesses that are present in the MFA workflow. Unlike traditional attacks that sought to bypass basic authentication protocols, newer schemes tend to follow normal MFA workflows to exploit human behavior. Attackers are also using other creative strategies to effectively circumvent MFA requirements. For example, they may hijack an already MFA-authenticated session to gain unauthorized access.

To evade cyberattacks, institutions must go beyond taking a relaxed, set-it-and-forget-it stance for MFA. They must enhance MFA by adopting newer more modern methods for their users. They must also be cognizant of attacks that can effectively bypass MFA, as we have seen with MFA-resistant phishing scams. To compensate for these newer styles of attacks, institutions should seek to implement multiple layers of security. In Azure, this will mean the adoption of Conditional Access Policies (CAPs). Stacking multiple CAPs targeting various combinations of MFA, apps, clients, locations, compliance status, and device types is the best way to improve an organization’s security posture. For more information about this important topic, watch our webinar on “MFA–Why You Can’t Set It and Forget It.”

23 Feb 2023

Banks, Credit Unions, Security Jamie Davis 0 comment

Mitigating Sophisticated, MFA-Resistant Phishing Scams

Phishing attacks are becoming more complex—and successful—making them more problematic for companies to combat. As a prime example, a recent phishing scam has been circumventing multifactor authentication (MFA) to successfully breach multiple companies. The attacks, which seem to be targeting banks and credit unions, are a stark reminder of the constant cyber threats that financial institutions face and the importance of following effective risk mitigation tactics.

The recent email scam is a sophisticated scheme; it exploits weaknesses in MFA and essentially bypasses them to launch an attack. The attackers deploy deceptive emails to obtain employees’ Microsoft 365 (M365) usernames, passwords, and MFA codes, and then they use this information to try to wire money outside the institution. Not only are these assaults breaching the initial targets, but they are also using the victims to infiltrate other companies.

The phishing scheme can be particularly detrimental to institutions that are not employing Azure Active Directory (Azure AD) Conditional Access Policies to bolster their security in Azure. Since Azure AD manages login credentials for users allowing them to access multiple M365 services and internal accounts from anywhere online, it is critical to apply access controls that provide another layer of protection beyond MFA.

Addressing Phishing Threats

There are various steps banks and credit unions can take to address MFA-resistant phishing attacks. Since humans are the weakest link in cybersecurity, institutions should ensure their employees are immediately informed about this particular phishing attack. They should also train employees regularly to recognize phishing emails so they can avoid being deceived. The key: Make sure employees know not to input their username and password in any link they receive by email.

Although this specific threat has the potential to exploit weaknesses in MFA, financial institutions should still implement this authentication method as it remains one of the most effective at blocking account compromises. As previously mentioned, it is also important to increase protection against attacks by adding Azure Conditional Access Policies to the Azure environment. Another preemptive step is to employ a monitoring and reporting solution for the Azure tenant. Often once a system is breached, attackers go into the tenant and create new rules to cover their tracks. Visibility into security settings through proactive reporting and alerts can make it easier for institutions to detect any suspicious activity or changes with logins and email rules, helping them stay on top of potential threats.

How Safe Systems Can Help

It can be challenging for many institutions to effectively manage their access and security settings in Azure AD and M365. However, Safe Systems offers CloudInsight™ M365 Security Basics to make the task easier. The CloudInsight™ collection of products offers a variety of reports and alerts that are specially designed to help institutions enhance their awareness of the Cloud. M365 Security Basics provides visibility into security settings for Azure AD and M365 tenants to help institutions detect targeted phishing or SPAM attacks. It can also expose other common risks like compromised user accounts, unknown users and forwarders; unapproved email access; and the unknown use of sharing tools. With M365 Security Basics, community banks, and credit unions can receive the expert insights they need to minimize, limit, or stop sophisticated phishing attacks.

07 Feb 2023

Banks, Compliance, Credit Unions Safe Systems 0 comment

Highlights from our Annual Look Back at Regulatory Updates

As 2023 continues to unfold, there are some important regulatory compliance tips, tricks, and trends that financial institutions should review from last year and consider in the future.

Looking Back

Two key issues to revisit from 2022 are the new Computer-Incident Notification Rule and updates to the 2018 Cybersecurity Resource Guide for Financial Institutions. The incident notification rule—approved in 2021 by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC), Federal Reserve System, and Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC), went into full effect in April 2022. Under the rule, banking organizations must promptly notify their primary federal regulator of certain computer security incidents that rise to the level of a notification incident within 36 hours. Anything that could materially disrupt or degrade your critical operations could be classified as a notification incident. Most institutions should have already adjusted the policies and procedures of their incident response plan to comply with the new notification requirements. If they haven’t, they should do so immediately because this will undoubtedly be an issue in the next examination cycle.

The rule also obligates third parties to report certain events that occur, so financial institutions should cover this issue with new vendors and those renewing contracts. Institutions should ensure that all contracts specify under what conditions third parties must inform them of any incident. Contracts should also identify at least one contact person to notify within the institution if an event occurs.

Late last year, the Federal Financial Institutions Examination Council (FFIEC) updated its Cybersecurity Resource Guide, which is designed to help financial institutions meet their security control objectives and prepare to respond to cyber incidents. The revised guide features updated references and a list of ransomware-specific resources, which is well warranted given the increasing frequency and complexity of ransomware incidents. The guide now includes eight different cybersecurity assessment tools that institutions may use, along with the “gold-standard” Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT) to combat the evolving threat of ransomware.

Looking Ahead

This year, ransomware will continue to be one of the key areas of focus for financial institutions—as well as auditors and examiners. Institutions should also start thinking of using the term “third-party risk management” instead of “vendor management” to match an impending shift in interagency guidance. The new terminology is more than just semantic, it represents a shift in how the agencies define anyone with whom you interact; including those with or without a contract, and with or without the exchange of compensation. Regulators will be releasing new guidance relating to the issue of third-party relationships and risk management. The stronger emphasis on third-party risk management is significant because it implies a broader and deeper scope of responsibility for institutions in terms of their engagement and oversight processes.

In addition, the guidance will likely propose a six-part, third-party risk management process. The process, for instance, will cover key areas like early planning, selection due diligence, and contract negotiation. It would be wise for institutions to begin contemplating these new expectations and how they will navigate the different aspects of third-party risk management in the future.

Anticipated Trends

There are also some potential trends that financial institutions should be aware of going forward. Based on their actual recommendations or observations, auditors and examiners expect institutions to:

Identify tolerances for processing and data recovery times for ransomware events—separately from the standard recovery times (RTOs) established in the business impact analysis.
Have a list of forensic experts available to call if they require assistance with cyber events. (Your cyber insurance provider may require you to utilize their associates, so it’s best to check.)
Formalize vendor information and ensure their management team is periodically updated about third-party risk management practices.
Have project management policies that address steps to request and approve new applications, including licensing, contracts, business justification, integration, and risk assessments.
Make provisions for succession planning for IT, which is a key component in the risk management program. (If necessary, smaller institutions might consider outsourcing the IT role to ensure an appropriate succession plan is in place.)

Read more about this topic by accessing our webinar on “Regulatory Tips, Tricks, and Trends—Looking Back and Ahead.” Or contact us for more information about how our compliance services are specially designed to help community banks and credit unions meet their regulatory requirements.

09 Mar 2022

Banks, Credit Unions, Technology Eric Delgado 0 comment

Microsoft Azure and 365 Security Basics Continued

When your institution acquired Microsoft 365 (also known as M365 and formerly called Office 365), it automatically created a Microsoft tenant with Azure AD. Since that tenant belongs to your organization, you are responsible for managing Azure AD and its security settings. Microsoft Azure services enable various default features that could be incompatible with the security, identity, and compliance requirements of your institution. it’s essential to customize the settings in Azure AD, M365, and Exchange Online (or Azure AD Premium P1, Intune, and Azure Information Protection) to fit your organization’s needs.

Customizing Azure AD Defaults

Security Defaults — Turn on security defaults to make it easier for your institution to thwart cyberattacks by using preconfigured security settings. (If your tenant was created on or after October 22, 2019, security defaults may already be enabled in your tenant.)
Password Policy — Configure the password policy applied to every user account that is created and managed directly in Azure AD. (Institutions with on-premises AD password policies governing password expirations should expect to manually synchronize their Azure AD password policy and their on-premises AD password policy.)
Azure AD Device Registration — Prevent users from joining devices on their own and require multi-factor authentication (MFA) to register or join devices with Azure AD.
Enterprise and Registered Apps — Keep non-administrator users from arbitrarily adding enterprise or registered applications, which can significantly increase risk. Afterwards, make sure to review every enterprise and registered application.
External Collaboration — Restrict regular users from inviting guests for collaboration and keep guest users from signing into your apps and services with their own work, school, or social identities.
Hybrid Identity with Password Hash Synchronization — Employ a hybrid identity architecture to synchronize users from on-premises Active Directory to Azure AD to minimize the number of identities users have across various platforms.
Azure AD Administration Portal — Limit regular users’ ability to read data in the Azure AD Administration Portal.
Administrator Review — Grant administrators only the specific permission they need to do their job and limit the number of static Global Administrator role assignments to fewer than five people.
Partners – When working with Microsoft-certified solution providers (partners) to purchase and manage solutions for your institution, they could be granted Global/Helpdesk admin roles giving them delegated administrative capabilities to your Azure instance. Make sure to review all partners and their delegated rights regularly.

Altering M365 and Exchange Online Settings

In M365, you can customize a variety of settings. In OneDrive, SharePoint Online, and Teams, look at configuring external collaboration capabilities of users. For Exchange Online, there are many settings to review but one to start with is the current forwarding capabilities and settings for users both globally and per-user. Modifying or reviewing these settings is highly advisable since they are inherently designed to facilitate interaction and external collaboration. In addition, you can use the Protection Center to secure mobile devices that are connected to your Microsoft 365 organization; the Security Center to refine email management; the Compliance Center to implement an effective data retention policy; and the M365 Admin Center to enhance security with modern authentication, which encompasses MFA. (According to Microsoft, 99.9 percent of account compromises can be blocked with MFA.)

And with the proper license, you can further enhance cloud security by optimizing the settings for Azure AD Premium P1, Intune, and Azure Information Protection.

M365 Security Basics Solution

Once your institution has sufficient settings in place to support your policies, it is essential to monitor for exceptions with reporting and alerting features such as those provided with Safe Systems CloudInsight™ M365 Security Basics solution. Financial institutions that partner with Safe Systems can gain critical visibility into their security settings helping them successfully navigate the complexities of optimizing M365’s features..

For more information about how your institution can optimize Azure AD and O365/M365 settings to improve cloud security, download our white paper on “Azure and M365 Security Basics.”

Important Disclaimer

The security settings that are discussed in this paper can have a dramatic impact on end-users and/or service functionality and should only be employed if deemed appropriate and after careful consideration. There are a variety of security options available, but organizations should strive to implement these technology services strategically and, ideally, through planned phases of objectives over potentially several months or even years. The recommendations, statements, and other concepts contained within this paper are provided primarily for the consideration of IT Administrators of financial institutions.

01 Mar 2022

Banks, Credit Unions, Technology Eric Delgado 0 comment

Managing Security, Identity, and Compliance within the Microsoft Azure and M365 Ecosystem

It can be challenging for financial institutions to manage security, identity, and compliance within Microsoft Azure Active Directory (Azure AD) and Microsoft 365 (also known as M365 and formerly branded as O365). Understanding the services and settings of the Azure AD and M365 ecosystem can make the process easier for IT administrators.

Some of the basic security settings that apply to most organizations fall under the free license level for Azure AD. These are also some of the low-hanging fruit that institutions can easily implement to make a dramatic difference in their security.

Security Defaults

One of the settings that can have the biggest impact is security defaults, which can be enabled to enforce a set of non-configurable conditional access policies. The policy set in Azure includes the ability to require multifactor authentication (MFA) and MFA registration for all users. It also offers the capability to block legacy authentication, which should be a high-priority goal for any organization.

Hackers can exploit basic authentication to effectively bypass MFA, which is a fundamental security service we recommend that every institution implement. If your institution has gone through the effort of enforcing MFA for users—but you’re not blocking basic authentication explicitly—there’s a major security gap. That gap should be addressed immediately, especially given Microsoft’s plans to decommission basic authentication protocols in Exchange Online in October 2022.

Identity Considerations

It’s also crucial to review the identity architecture for your financial institution. Any user, device, or app connecting to Azure should have an identity, whether it’s a guest user, mobile device, Mac OS device, or a Windows computer, so it can be assigned data access rights or even take on administrative capabilities. Every identity outside of Active Directory—which is the primary identity for users in many institutions—is another attack vector in a different system. An effective way to manage different identities is to consolidate them by sourcing them at the AD level and then synchronizing users and their password hashes to Azure AD. You should also review the level of access for all administrators as well as partners as they represent a huge risk downstream. Reviewing the level of access for partners goes beyond security; it’s also a matter of regulatory compliance.

Additional Considerations

Depending on your institution’s license level, there are additional Azure and M365 settings you can adjust in the areas of protection, compliance, and administration. For example, global auditing is an essential setting that should be enabled to augment security and facilitate troubleshooting after attacks. You should also block settings allowing for open collaboration and outbound email forwarding to avoid data loss and minimize cyberattacks.

If your institution is at the M365 level, it also needs the mobile device management (MDM) platform that offers sufficient protection. Exchange Online has built-in MDM capabilities but these capabilities do not extend to all M365/O365 apps.

Conditional access policies govern sign-ins and attempts. They can enable the enforcement of MFA and are the highest control layer for determining who has access to the data within Azure’s security ecosystem.

Since data lives outside of Exchange Online in the M365 world, if your institution has specific compliance requirements for retention, your retention policies will generally need to extend to all data.

M365 Security Basics

Adjusting all the security settings of Azure AD and M365 can be a daunting task, especially since Microsoft is constantly updating the features of its technology services. Our CloudInsight™ M365 Security Basics solution provides insights into security settings for Azure AD and M365 tenants. It helps IT administrators navigate the complexities of customizing their institution’s security settings through three services: reporting, alerting, and quarterly reviews.

The reporting service provides ongoing Microsoft data and packages it into a readable format that shows security settings at a glance, allowing institutions to easily see irregularities, such as when users sign in from Outside of the USA. Alerting sends a notification when an activity indicates that a potential compromise has occurred. With the quarterly reviews, trained experts analyze the settings, reports, and alerts and review them with administrators so they can speak with confidence to their board, steering committees, and auditors about their institution’s technology services and cloud security.

If you need help understanding how M365 Security Basics can support your financial institution’s risk mitigation or strategic planning efforts, contact us. You can learn more about this topic with our “How to Manage Security Identity and Compliance within the Microsoft Azure and M365 Ecosystem” webinar.

Important Disclaimer

28 Dec 2021

Banks, Credit Unions, Security Jamie Davis 0 comment

Cybersecurity Insurance and Multi-Factor Authentication

Financial institutions are increasingly embracing cybersecurity insurance as an important aspect of their information security program. Cyber insurance can offer vital coverage to protect businesses from various technology-related risks. Data breach insurance, for example, helps companies respond if personally identifiable information gets lost or stolen from their computers—whether intentionally by a hacker or accidentally by an employee. Cyber liability insurance offers expanded protection to help businesses prepare for, respond to, and recover from cyberattacks.

As cybercrimes continue to intensify, more cybersecurity insurance companies are calling for organizations to employ multi-factor authentication (MFA). Some carriers are even refusing to provide insurance quotes to companies that are not using this authentication method. From their perspective, MFA adoption makes perfect sense; it keeps unauthorized individuals from accessing sensitive information, reducing ransomware, data breaches, and other cyberattacks. This, in turn, minimizes insurance claims and saves carriers money.

For insurance providers, MFA is appealing because it lowers cyber risk by requiring users to verify who they are. The individual must furnish valid identification data followed by at least one other credential: a password, one-time passcode, or physical characteristics like their fingerprint or face. This strict authentication system allows organizations to certify people’s identity—before granting them access to sensitive information, an account, or other assets—and this can significantly strengthen their security.

While MFA is heavily promoted by many cyber insurance companies, an institution’s regulators may not require financial institutions to use multi-factor authentication. However, implementing MFA for a whole internal network may not be a simple task. Depending on the solution, it may require installing agent software to all the endpoints requiring MFA and configuring appropriate “break-glass” accounts for emergency use, which creates more infrastructure to be monitored and managed.

MFA Implementation Tips

To simplify MFA implementation, Banks and credit unions can apply a sequenced strategy instead of jumping straight to the internal network. As a first step, institutions can ensure MFA is turned on for all remote-access users, including creating endpoint control policies for their devices. The next logical step would be to lock down MFA for cloud applications. This includes Microsoft Online services like M365 (formerly Office 365) and Azure Active Directory (Azure AD). These solutions come with a variety of free security features that organizations can customize to their business requirements. Even at low licensing levels, these products allow MFA to be turned on for all users—which can be highly effective for averting business email compromise and ransomware attacks. But institutions will need higher-level licensing if they want to make conditional access policies based on the specific location, identity, or device of users. Azure AD Premium P1 and M365 Enterprise E3, for example, have a variety of advanced features that allow conditional access policies to be established to enhance security.

MFA is just one layer of security for banks and credit unions to consider. We hope this post provided some insight into applying MFA for both security and insurance purposes. To learn more about this topic and other security layers, listen to our recent “Ransomware, Cybersecurity, and MFA” webinar, hosted by our Chief Technology Officer, Brendan McGowan.

06 Dec 2021

Banks, Credit Unions, Security Jamie Davis 0 comment

How Layered Security Can Address Growing Cyberthreats

With the increasing complexity of cyberattacks, financial institutions need to implement more effective—and comprehensive—security measures. They need a variety of elements to create a layered approach to secure their data, infrastructure, and other resources from potential cyberthreats.

Many organizations rely on a castle-and-moat network security model where everyone inside the network is trusted by default. (Think of the network as the castle and the network perimeter as the moat.) No one outside the network is able to access data on the inside, but everyone inside the network can. However, security gaps may still exist in this model and others. The best approach to compensate for gaps is to surround the network with layers of security.

The basic “table stakes” for a layered security approach include a perimeter firewall with content filtering, email threat filters, an endpoint malware solution, and a robust patch management process. Banks and credit unions could also invest in additional and more sophisticated layers but each one will have associated acquisition and management costs, along with ongoing maintenance. So, it’s prudent for institutions to invest only in the number of layers/solutions they can competently manage.

Key Concerns

Today the top IT security concern for many organizations is ransomware. Due to the proactive measures many financial institutions have taken, the banking industry has fewer security breaches than health care and some other industries thus far. However, when a breach does happen to a financial institution, the impact is more costly than breaches occurring in other industries.

Four-Layer Security Formula

With these concerns in mind, here’s a four-layer “recipe” organizations can employ to improve their security posture:

Training and Testing: Using email phishing tests can serve as a good foundation for minimizing BEC and other social engineering threats.
Network Design: Institutions should refresh older networks to segment their components into different zones. It’s no longer sufficient to have servers, workstations, and printers sitting in one IP space together.
Domain Name System (DNS) filtering: DNS filtering prevents potentially damaging traffic from ever reaching the network. Because it proactively blocks threats, this makes it one of the most effective and affordable security layers institutions can apply.
Endpoint Protection: Institutions should have this type of protection on each of their endpoints, and the best endpoint protection tools have built-in ransomware solutions.

Other Important Considerations

It’s important to back up data regularly and ensure that those backups are well beyond the reach of ransomware and other threats. (Backups done to a local server that’s on-site and are still on the network may be susceptible to ransomware.) One way to address this issue is to have immutable backups, which are backup files that can’t be altered in any way and can deploy to production servers immediately in case of ransomware attacks or other data loss. Another option is to send backups to a cloud solution like Microsoft Azure Storage, which is affordable and easy to integrate because there are no servers to manage.

Another crucial element in security is Transport Layer Security/Secure Sockets Layer (TLS/SSL) encryption protocol, which can be somewhat of a double-edged sword. About 80 percent of website traffic is encrypted to protect it from unauthorized users during transmission. Traditional firewalls don’t have the ability to scrutinize traffic against a content filtering engine, which means savvy hackers can hide ransomware and other dangerous content inside. But firewalls with advanced features are capable of TLS/SSL inspection; they can decrypt content, analyze it for threats, and then re-encrypt the traffic before entering or leaving the network.

There’s an array of security solutions that institutions can implement to establish layered protection against cyber threats. For more insights about this topic, listen to our webinar on “Cyber Threats, Why You Need a Layered Approach.”

21 Sep 2021

Banks, Credit Unions, Technology Marshall Jones 0 comment

Multi-Factor Authentication Offers Secure, Reliable Access Control

In our increasingly digital world, financial institutions must go beyond requiring only usernames and passwords for the sign-in process. They need to employ a combination of factors to validate the individuals using their resources, whether they’re customers accessing electronic products and services or employees accessing systems, applications, and data. Institutions can choose various levels of authentication to verify people’s identity before giving them access to sensitive information, accounts, and other assets. However, multi-factor authentication (MFA) offers a secure and reliable approach for reducing the potential for unauthorized access.

One of the key values of MFA lies in its use of multiple factors for the validation process. MFA adds a layer of protection by requiring users to present a variety of elements to prove who they are. With this method, users must supply valid identification data such as a username followed by at least two types of credentials, such as:

Something the person knows: This represents “secret” information that is known or shared by both the user and the authenticating entity. Passwords and personal identification numbers (PINs) are the most commonly used shared secrets, but newer methods of identification are gaining popularity. Users may be required to answer questions that only they should know, like the amount of their monthly mortgage payment. Another example is they might have to identify their pre-selected image (chosen when they opened their account) from a group of pictures.
Something the person has: This is often a security token or a physical device, such as an I.D. card or smartphone, that people must have in their possession. Password-generating tokens can significantly enhance security because they display a random, one-time password or passcode that the recipient must promptly provide to complete the authentication process. Having unpredictable, one-time passwords makes it more challenging for hackers to use keyboard logging to steal credentials.
Something the person is: This more complex approach to authentication uses a physical characteristic (biometrics) such as face, fingerprint, or voice recognition to verify people’s identity.

Since MFA incorporates factors based on knowledge, possession, and/or biometrics, it makes it more difficult for cybercriminals to compromise people’s identity. Thus, MFA is an ideal verification method to use when more sensitive or critical assets are at stake. MFA is so reliable that the Federal Financial Institution Examination Council (FFIEC) recommends applying it in more high-risk situations. “Management should use multi-factor authentication over encrypted network connections for administrators accessing and managing network devices,” states the FFIEC IT Handbook’s Architecture, Infrastructure, and Operations booklet.

MFA gives financial institutions a valuable security control for their internal and cloud resources. Take our quiz to see how much you know about multi-factor authentication.