multifactor authentication Archives

29 Aug 2024

Banks, Credit Unions, Technology Eric Delgado 0 comment

Understanding and Avoiding Misconfigurations in Conditional Access Policies

Conditional Access Policies (CAPs) are essential for safeguarding your financial institution’s data and ensuring that only authorized users gain access to critical systems. Yet, misconfigurations in these policies can create significant vulnerabilities. In a recent webinar, Top 3 Most Common Misconfigurations for CAPs, Safe Systems’ M365-certified administrators delved into common mistakes and demonstrated firsthand how to fix them.

This webinar was the first in the highly anticipated M365 Immersion Training, a 4-part online series focusing on the most crucial aspects of Microsoft 365 (M365) security. This blog explores some of the highlights from the first session, including key terminology, policy scenarios, and best practices for policy management.

Understanding the Language of Conditional Access

CAPs act as an identity firewall, setting stringent conditions for user authentication across various applications and devices. Before diving into the complexities of CAPs, it’s crucial to grasp the key terminology.

Entra ID: The identity platform within Azure where CAPs reside.
Named Locations: These are specific network locations, such as IP ranges or countries, recognized by CAPs.
Logic Gaps: Holes in your policy set that can lead to unauthorized access.
Compensating Controls: Additional policies created to target logic gaps found in your CAPs.

Understanding these terms is the first step toward ensuring that your CAPs are both effective and secure.

3 Most Common Misconfigurations

Misconfiguring CAPs is like locking every door in your house but forgetting to lock the windows; it might look secure on the surface but is fundamentally flawed. CAPs must be meticulously configured to avoid creating security vulnerabilities.

Here are the three most common errors to be aware of:

Exclusion of Break Glass Accounts: These are emergency access accounts that should almost always be excluded from CAPs to ensure that administrators can regain control in case of a lockout or technology failure.
Improper Definition of Named Locations: Incorrectly defining a named location can lead to overly broad or restrictive access controls.
Overlooking Multi-factor Authentication (MFA) Requirements: Failing to extend MFA requirements to cover all potential access scenarios can expose the system to unauthorized access.

Implementing fixes is not just about addressing the immediate issue but also about future-proofing your CAPs. To see a hands-on demonstration of how these common misconfigurations can occur and how our team resolves them, watch this 5 minute excerpt from the webinar.

Key Takeaways and Best Practices

Effective management of CAPs is not just about implementation but also about ongoing management and continuous improvement. Institutions should adopt the following best practices to ensure their CAPs provide the intended security without unintended consequences:

Proper Naming and Documentation: Ensure accurate and meaningful naming for CAPs and related entities to avoid confusion.
Use of Report-Only Mode: Initially deploy policies in report-only mode to monitor their impact without affecting business continuity.
Regular Review and Testing: Policies should be reviewed and tested at least quarterly to ensure they align with current security needs and operational requirements.
External Validation: Utilize external audits from trusted vendors for an unbiased assessment.
Comprehensive Training: Ensure that IT staff are well-trained in understanding and managing CAPs, including awareness of common pitfalls and best practices.

Conclusion

Conditional Access Policies are your frontline defense against unauthorized access. Regular reviews, external audits, and comprehensive documentation are your keys to mastering CAPs, ensuring that your security measures are always a step ahead of potential threats.

If you’ve missed this session, it’s not too late to register for the rest of the M365 Immersion Training. When you register for the series, you will gain access to the full recording of this webinar, plus all upcoming live sessions.

29 Sep 2023

Banks, Credit Unions, Security, Technology Eric Delgado 0 comment

Using Conditional Access Policies and MFA to Enhance Azure AD Security

Earlier this year, we saw a large influx of successful phishing campaigns, primarily due to attackers being able to circumvent multifactor authentication (MFA). Their schemes worked because they were able to trick users into clicking on a link and giving away their security token—essentially bypassing MFA. The human-error factor highlights the need for phishing simulation training to ensure users are more aware of security threats. With phishing attacks still running rampant—and becoming more complex and harder to detect—it’s imperative that financial institutions use multiple strategies and technologies to optimize security.

The implications of MFA-resistant phishing are huge; the attacks have the potential to affect numerous organizations that depend on Microsoft Entra ID (formerly Azure AD) and Microsoft Office/M365 services to support their operations. However, institutions can minimize account compromises by combining a variety of tactics to prevent cyberattacks from happening. For instance, conditional access policies (CAPs) are a key proactive measure that banks and credit unions can implement to enhance security.

CAPs—which are quickly becoming the baseline of security—are the cornerstone of protecting identities within Microsoft Entra ID. These policies protect the very first step of the identification chain, the sign in attempt. They govern the conditions for users to access Azure services and will grant or deny access based on configured logic. At a high level, this logic can be far reaching but even so, organizations will not rely on only a single CAP. No CAP can provide complete protection. Instead, financial institutions should stack multiple CAPs together to produce better overall coverage and security. For example, requiring MFA, denying sign ins form outside of the USA, and requiring device compliance or specific join status.

Not only will organizations look to stack multiple CAPs, but they will also look to utilize telemetry from multiple Azure services for their logic. Combining services means institutions must have the appropriate licensing for each respective Azure service. For example, to obtain device compliance information, organizations will be required to implement and license for Intune.

Additionally, when designing CAP logic, it can be helpful to take as broad of an approach as possible to the scope of the CAP. The objective is to try to affect as many areas as possible with a single stroke to maximize coverage and reduce gaps in logic. Gaps, or logic bugs, are the result of incorrect scope definitions which will leave an organization vulnerable or at risk when they believe otherwise. A good example of a logic bug is when an organization implements a CAP requiring MFA but not for all users. This leaves a subset of the user base at risk.

Generally, when it comes to creating gaps in logic for CAPs, the rule of thumb is to always create compensating controls. This is how organizations can create complex webs of conditions and still allow for business continuity while simultaneously reducing risk. The trade-off is the more complex an organization’s CAPs are, the harder they will be to design, assess at a glance, and to maintain.

By blending various security tactics and technologies, financial institutions can implement a layered approach to enhance their security posture. They can also partner with a third-party expert like Safe Systems to improve their ability to proactively detect and respond to phishing attacks and other threats. Our CloudInsight™ M365 Security Basics solution offers critical reporting and alerting to help institutions better gauge their security awareness. M365 Security Basics provides visibility into security settings for Azure AD and M365, making it easier for institutions to mitigate the impact of potential cyberattacks.

For more information about how to employ CAPS and modern MFA to minimize security risks, view our recorded webinar on “Securing Azure AD with Conditional Access Policies.“

09 Mar 2022

Banks, Credit Unions, Technology Eric Delgado 0 comment

Microsoft Azure and 365 Security Basics Continued

When your institution acquired Microsoft 365 (also known as M365 and formerly called Office 365), it automatically created a Microsoft tenant with Azure AD. Since that tenant belongs to your organization, you are responsible for managing Azure AD and its security settings. Microsoft Azure services enable various default features that could be incompatible with the security, identity, and compliance requirements of your institution. it’s essential to customize the settings in Azure AD, M365, and Exchange Online (or Azure AD Premium P1, Intune, and Azure Information Protection) to fit your organization’s needs.

Customizing Azure AD Defaults

Security Defaults — Turn on security defaults to make it easier for your institution to thwart cyberattacks by using preconfigured security settings. (If your tenant was created on or after October 22, 2019, security defaults may already be enabled in your tenant.)
Password Policy — Configure the password policy applied to every user account that is created and managed directly in Azure AD. (Institutions with on-premises AD password policies governing password expirations should expect to manually synchronize their Azure AD password policy and their on-premises AD password policy.)
Azure AD Device Registration — Prevent users from joining devices on their own and require multi-factor authentication (MFA) to register or join devices with Azure AD.
Enterprise and Registered Apps — Keep non-administrator users from arbitrarily adding enterprise or registered applications, which can significantly increase risk. Afterwards, make sure to review every enterprise and registered application.
External Collaboration — Restrict regular users from inviting guests for collaboration and keep guest users from signing into your apps and services with their own work, school, or social identities.
Hybrid Identity with Password Hash Synchronization — Employ a hybrid identity architecture to synchronize users from on-premises Active Directory to Azure AD to minimize the number of identities users have across various platforms.
Azure AD Administration Portal — Limit regular users’ ability to read data in the Azure AD Administration Portal.
Administrator Review — Grant administrators only the specific permission they need to do their job and limit the number of static Global Administrator role assignments to fewer than five people.
Partners – When working with Microsoft-certified solution providers (partners) to purchase and manage solutions for your institution, they could be granted Global/Helpdesk admin roles giving them delegated administrative capabilities to your Azure instance. Make sure to review all partners and their delegated rights regularly.

Altering M365 and Exchange Online Settings

In M365, you can customize a variety of settings. In OneDrive, SharePoint Online, and Teams, look at configuring external collaboration capabilities of users. For Exchange Online, there are many settings to review but one to start with is the current forwarding capabilities and settings for users both globally and per-user. Modifying or reviewing these settings is highly advisable since they are inherently designed to facilitate interaction and external collaboration. In addition, you can use the Protection Center to secure mobile devices that are connected to your Microsoft 365 organization; the Security Center to refine email management; the Compliance Center to implement an effective data retention policy; and the M365 Admin Center to enhance security with modern authentication, which encompasses MFA. (According to Microsoft, 99.9 percent of account compromises can be blocked with MFA.)

And with the proper license, you can further enhance cloud security by optimizing the settings for Azure AD Premium P1, Intune, and Azure Information Protection.

M365 Security Basics Solution

Once your institution has sufficient settings in place to support your policies, it is essential to monitor for exceptions with reporting and alerting features such as those provided with Safe Systems CloudInsight™ M365 Security Basics solution. Financial institutions that partner with Safe Systems can gain critical visibility into their security settings helping them successfully navigate the complexities of optimizing M365’s features..

For more information about how your institution can optimize Azure AD and O365/M365 settings to improve cloud security, download our white paper on “Azure and M365 Security Basics.”

Important Disclaimer

The security settings that are discussed in this paper can have a dramatic impact on end-users and/or service functionality and should only be employed if deemed appropriate and after careful consideration. There are a variety of security options available, but organizations should strive to implement these technology services strategically and, ideally, through planned phases of objectives over potentially several months or even years. The recommendations, statements, and other concepts contained within this paper are provided primarily for the consideration of IT Administrators of financial institutions.

01 Mar 2022

Banks, Credit Unions, Technology Eric Delgado 0 comment

Managing Security, Identity, and Compliance within the Microsoft Azure and M365 Ecosystem

It can be challenging for financial institutions to manage security, identity, and compliance within Microsoft Azure Active Directory (Azure AD) and Microsoft 365 (also known as M365 and formerly branded as O365). Understanding the services and settings of the Azure AD and M365 ecosystem can make the process easier for IT administrators.

Some of the basic security settings that apply to most organizations fall under the free license level for Azure AD. These are also some of the low-hanging fruit that institutions can easily implement to make a dramatic difference in their security.

Security Defaults

One of the settings that can have the biggest impact is security defaults, which can be enabled to enforce a set of non-configurable conditional access policies. The policy set in Azure includes the ability to require multifactor authentication (MFA) and MFA registration for all users. It also offers the capability to block legacy authentication, which should be a high-priority goal for any organization.

Hackers can exploit basic authentication to effectively bypass MFA, which is a fundamental security service we recommend that every institution implement. If your institution has gone through the effort of enforcing MFA for users—but you’re not blocking basic authentication explicitly—there’s a major security gap. That gap should be addressed immediately, especially given Microsoft’s plans to decommission basic authentication protocols in Exchange Online in October 2022.

Identity Considerations

It’s also crucial to review the identity architecture for your financial institution. Any user, device, or app connecting to Azure should have an identity, whether it’s a guest user, mobile device, Mac OS device, or a Windows computer, so it can be assigned data access rights or even take on administrative capabilities. Every identity outside of Active Directory—which is the primary identity for users in many institutions—is another attack vector in a different system. An effective way to manage different identities is to consolidate them by sourcing them at the AD level and then synchronizing users and their password hashes to Azure AD. You should also review the level of access for all administrators as well as partners as they represent a huge risk downstream. Reviewing the level of access for partners goes beyond security; it’s also a matter of regulatory compliance.

Additional Considerations

Depending on your institution’s license level, there are additional Azure and M365 settings you can adjust in the areas of protection, compliance, and administration. For example, global auditing is an essential setting that should be enabled to augment security and facilitate troubleshooting after attacks. You should also block settings allowing for open collaboration and outbound email forwarding to avoid data loss and minimize cyberattacks.

If your institution is at the M365 level, it also needs the mobile device management (MDM) platform that offers sufficient protection. Exchange Online has built-in MDM capabilities but these capabilities do not extend to all M365/O365 apps.

Conditional access policies govern sign-ins and attempts. They can enable the enforcement of MFA and are the highest control layer for determining who has access to the data within Azure’s security ecosystem.

Since data lives outside of Exchange Online in the M365 world, if your institution has specific compliance requirements for retention, your retention policies will generally need to extend to all data.

M365 Security Basics

Adjusting all the security settings of Azure AD and M365 can be a daunting task, especially since Microsoft is constantly updating the features of its technology services. Our CloudInsight™ M365 Security Basics solution provides insights into security settings for Azure AD and M365 tenants. It helps IT administrators navigate the complexities of customizing their institution’s security settings through three services: reporting, alerting, and quarterly reviews.

The reporting service provides ongoing Microsoft data and packages it into a readable format that shows security settings at a glance, allowing institutions to easily see irregularities, such as when users sign in from Outside of the USA. Alerting sends a notification when an activity indicates that a potential compromise has occurred. With the quarterly reviews, trained experts analyze the settings, reports, and alerts and review them with administrators so they can speak with confidence to their board, steering committees, and auditors about their institution’s technology services and cloud security.

If you need help understanding how M365 Security Basics can support your financial institution’s risk mitigation or strategic planning efforts, contact us. You can learn more about this topic with our “How to Manage Security Identity and Compliance within the Microsoft Azure and M365 Ecosystem” webinar.

Important Disclaimer

11 Oct 2021

Banks, Compliance, Credit Unions, Security, Technology Jamie Davis 0 comment

What Financial Institutions Should Budget for in 2022

Many of us thought 2021 was going to be the downhill side of the pandemic. I recall working on a webinar presentation that we hosted last summer and including the words, “Now that the pandemic is behind us…” Obviously, I was overly optimistic. As we look ahead to 2022, we must acknowledge that the COVID-19 pandemic will continue to affect us to one degree or another. With that said, these budgeting ideas for 2022 may look somewhat similar to those for 2021, but there are slight variations based on current banking technology, compliance, and security issues.

1. Multifactor Authentication

Implement multifactor authentication (MFA) on all your email accounts wherever it is possible and appropriate. MFA can reduce the risk of having account credentials compromised by as much as 99.9%, making it one of the most effective measures you can use to protect your institution. There is typically a small cost for licensing and implementing MFA software. So, you can add MFA to your email accounts for a nominal cost and with minimal effort in most cases. If you are using Microsoft’s cloud email solution, for instance, implementing MFA can be as easy as changing a few minor settings. Another area to consider for MFA is logging into the domain account. There can be a cost associated with this as you will probably want to use a tool to help you manage the process. You can apply MFA only on accounts with administrator rights or on all users. But since many cybersecurity insurance companies are requiring MFA for accounts with administrator rights, using this stronger type of authentication might be your only option.

2. Laptops

With different variants of COVID-19 or other viruses popping up, remote work may still be an option for certain employees. Remote capabilities may even be necessary to keep the institution operating smoothly at times. Be sure you have the infrastructure in place for a partial remote workforce because the need could develop at any point. For this reason, you should consider providing laptops for all employees who could conceivably work from home. Start with those who need new devices. Then prioritize based on those doing the highest-level work necessary to keep the institution running. Laptops and encryption software, required for mobile devices, may cost slightly more but should not cause a huge increase in expenditures. In some cases, you may be able to reuse a desktop computer to replace an older workstation for an employee whose duties cannot be performed remotely.

And don’t forget… There is a chip shortage and high demand for laptops, which means it can take months to secure computers and other hardware. So, order any equipment you need well in advance to ensure you have the appropriate infrastructure in place to support staff that may need to work from home.

3. Moving to the Cloud

Having infrastructure in the cloud can be extremely beneficial, so slowly start moving your infrastructure to the cloud. Cloud infrastructure decreases the need for an employee to be onsite with the hardware, and cloud computing increases uptime. In addition, disaster recovery becomes easier and faster with cloud infrastructure. More than 90% of Fortune 500 companies are running at least some infrastructure in the cloud, primarily through Microsoft’s cloud computing platform: Azure. The cloud is the future of IT and infrastructure, and it makes sense for institutions that need reliable and resilient infrastructures. So, if you need to purchase a server next year, consider getting a quote for moving the server to the cloud instead.

4. Cloud Security

While the cloud offers plenty of advantages, it comes with settings, management tools, and security options that must be effectively configured and managed to ensure the highest level of security in the cloud. Cloud security is a concern for not only institutions with infrastructure in the cloud, but also for M365 Windows/Office licensees with OneDrive enabled, email in the cloud, or using Microsoft as an authentication mechanism with a third-party application. Earlier this year, the FDIC released a letter outlining the need to secure cloud configurations. Their cloud-security concerns are warranted. Safe Systems has worked with several institutions ranging from a hundred million in assets up to multibillion dollars in assets and found that almost every institution had gaps in their cloud security. Some institutions had indications of their email or user accounts being compromised; others had settings that could open the door to future compromises. Safe Systems worked closely with these institutions to develop an innovative M365 Security solution to address these issues with reports, alerts, and reviews. This unique product is specifically designed to help financial institutions manage their cloud setup now and in the future. In addition, it is a reasonably priced option for the substantial amount of value that it delivers. Institutions should reach out for a quote to determine if M365 Security could fit into their budget next year.

5. Virtual ISO

Another item to consider for your budget is virtual Information Security Officer or VISO services, which we also mentioned last year. These services have become increasingly popular as the landscape of information security has grown more extensive and complex. In many cases, institutions are finding it harder to keep up with the latest information security expectations, regulations, and trends. Safe Systems’ ISOversight service addresses this problem by combining applications for self-management with assistance from compliance experts to offer a VISO service at a competitive price. This type of service can be beneficial in many ways as it can provide structure, automation, accountability, assistance, and consistency throughout your information security program. It can also enable your institution to stay engaged, which is critical when an exam or audit occurs. VISO services, which vary in price depending on the work being performed by the third-party provider, are ideal for any institution with limited access to security expertise in-house.

6. Cybersecurity

You cannot have a conversation about budgets for next year without addressing the issue of cybersecurity. Consider this: Cyber-attacks are 300 times more likely to hit financial services firms than other companies, a recent Boston Consulting Group report indicates. Cyber-attacks continue to climb each year, with the global cybersecurity market expected to eclipse $300 billion by 2024, according to Global Insights. And cybersecurity has become even more precarious during the COVID-19 pandemic. The pandemic has created new opportunities for security breaches as the increase in remote work makes information security more challenging to manage. Unfortunately, institutions will need to increase their security layers and annual spending to address this issue. According to Computer Services Inc. (CSI), 59% of financial institutions will increase spending for cybersecurity this year.

In Conclusion

The threat to your institution’s data is as real today as it ever has been. Therefore, make sure you are applying these measures to strengthen your security:

Employee training to ensure adequate, effective, and safe practices
Perimeter protection to ensure the appropriate layers are enabled and all traffic is being handled correctly, including encrypted traffic
Advanced threat protection and logging to be able to identify how, if at all, malware or an intrusion created an incident
Backup and data redundancy to ensure ransomware cannot wipe out your data

Have a conversation with a security company you trust to ensure that, if you are the target of a ransomware attack, your business won’t sustain long-term damage. In other words, invest in cybersecurity now, so your institution won’t end up paying more later.

As you contemplate your budget for 2022, don’t just think about the items that others have put on your plate. Be sure to consider the changes that may have occurred at your institution—and the ones that may be coming—and have a plan to address these. All these changes can be exciting and make a major difference for your institution. But they can often be hard to get implemented if they are not budgeted for ahead of time.

21 Sep 2021

Banks, Credit Unions, Technology Marshall Jones 0 comment

Multi-Factor Authentication Offers Secure, Reliable Access Control

In our increasingly digital world, financial institutions must go beyond requiring only usernames and passwords for the sign-in process. They need to employ a combination of factors to validate the individuals using their resources, whether they’re customers accessing electronic products and services or employees accessing systems, applications, and data. Institutions can choose various levels of authentication to verify people’s identity before giving them access to sensitive information, accounts, and other assets. However, multi-factor authentication (MFA) offers a secure and reliable approach for reducing the potential for unauthorized access.

One of the key values of MFA lies in its use of multiple factors for the validation process. MFA adds a layer of protection by requiring users to present a variety of elements to prove who they are. With this method, users must supply valid identification data such as a username followed by at least two types of credentials, such as:

Something the person knows: This represents “secret” information that is known or shared by both the user and the authenticating entity. Passwords and personal identification numbers (PINs) are the most commonly used shared secrets, but newer methods of identification are gaining popularity. Users may be required to answer questions that only they should know, like the amount of their monthly mortgage payment. Another example is they might have to identify their pre-selected image (chosen when they opened their account) from a group of pictures.
Something the person has: This is often a security token or a physical device, such as an I.D. card or smartphone, that people must have in their possession. Password-generating tokens can significantly enhance security because they display a random, one-time password or passcode that the recipient must promptly provide to complete the authentication process. Having unpredictable, one-time passwords makes it more challenging for hackers to use keyboard logging to steal credentials.
Something the person is: This more complex approach to authentication uses a physical characteristic (biometrics) such as face, fingerprint, or voice recognition to verify people’s identity.

Since MFA incorporates factors based on knowledge, possession, and/or biometrics, it makes it more difficult for cybercriminals to compromise people’s identity. Thus, MFA is an ideal verification method to use when more sensitive or critical assets are at stake. MFA is so reliable that the Federal Financial Institution Examination Council (FFIEC) recommends applying it in more high-risk situations. “Management should use multi-factor authentication over encrypted network connections for administrators accessing and managing network devices,” states the FFIEC IT Handbook’s Architecture, Infrastructure, and Operations booklet.

MFA gives financial institutions a valuable security control for their internal and cloud resources. Take our quiz to see how much you know about multi-factor authentication.

23 Jul 2020

Banks, Credit Unions, Security Marshall Jones 0 comment

Securing Microsoft 365: Using Multifactor Authentication to Combat Business Email Compromise

Securing Microsoft 365

In today’s security landscape, business email compromise (BEC) is one of the most prolific online crimes, and these attacks are often aimed at financial institutions. In a BEC scam, cybercriminals send email messages to bank staff that looks like a legitimate request in an attempt to gain access to non-public information. To mitigate this threat, community banks and credit unions should take advantage of the security settings offered in Microsoft 365.

Microsoft has multiple service offerings to secure against all kinds of attack vectors. However, the easiest security setting financial institutions often overlook is multifactor authentication (MFA), which requires more than one method of authentication to verify a user’s identity for a login or other transaction. The methods typically include something you know (pin); something you have (phone) and/or something you are (biometrics).

Microsoft’s analysis has determined that 99.9% of account compromises can be blocked with MFA, but the overall adoption rate is only 46%. Why is this the case? Financial institutions run into two key pain points that prevent them from implementing MFA:

1. Time

Many IT administrators are tasked with having to set up their users on MFA, and simply don’t have the resources to do this all on their own. Let’s face it, this can be a time-consuming task to complete in addition to the other daily IT activities IT admins have on their plate. One option is to identify who your early adopters will be and let them become technology champions. This can be branch managers or team leads across your locations that can offer assistance to less experienced users. Another option is to work with a third-party provider that can handle the implementation process, enabling IT staff to work on more pressing tasks for the institution.

2. Bring Your Own Device (BYOD)

Most organizations have a BYOD policy in place, but it is normally in regard to accessing company resources, like email, teams or SharePoint where it is clear that the user is attempting to access company data for business-related activity. However, employee-owned devices can make MFA trickier to navigate since IT administrators may find themselves in a position where they are asking users to complete the MFA process on a personal device in order to access these company resources. Regardless, when MFA is added to the BYOD policy, it can effectively make BYOD safer.

MFA Options to Fit Your Institution’s Needs
There are many MFA options and some of them do not require the use of a personal device to verify a user’s identity. Many employees do not like the idea of having to install a mobile app on their phone, but they have no issues with an occasional text message or phone call. When implementing MFA for your institution, the best thing you can do for your users is to go over all of the available options and highlight the option your institution prefers them to use. For instance, when setting up MFA for our customers, we recommend the Microsoft Authenticator App.

Here are a few options to consider:

Microsoft Authenticator App – A user will use a one-time passcode or simply approve logins using the free Microsoft Authenticator app.
Call to Phone – This option is for landline phones. If your employees have a direct line, this is a good option to try. If the user does not have a direct line, keep in mind you would have to work out a procedural system for whoever is answering the phone to give the MFA information to the intended target.
Text message to phone – Sends a text message to the user’s mobile phone number containing a one-time code whenever you sign in from a new device.
Notification through desktop – Allows users to have MFA one-time passcode generation on their work desktop which helps to avoid use of personal devices.
Verification code from hardware token –User uses a one-time passcode generated from a hardware token. Microsoft provides the technology to implement this method, but you have to buy the hardware tokens and manage them. This is the only MFA method that comes with direct costs.

Not all MFA options are the same in terms of strength of security. However, your overall security posture is still enhanced by enabling MFA with any of these options. MFA is a low-cost option that protects your financial institution from cyber-attacks and other malicious activity. If you’re interested in implementing MFA for your financial institution, please reach out to Safe Systems to find an option that fits best with your institution’s unique needs.